Books'n'Bytes

The Review

The Encyclopedia of Fantasy

by John Clute

The Encyclopedia of Fantasy

What's in this book

  • John Clute and John Grant's 1997 compendium reference work - the canonical encyclopedia of fantasy
  • Hugo Award winner Best Related Work 1998; canonical reference work for the broader genre
  • Over 1100 pages of patient documentary research across the entire twentieth-century fantasy tradition
  • Maintained as a paired companion to The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (1979 / 1993 editions)
  • For readers of canonical fantasy history, scholarship, and the broader Clute reference catalog
  • A canonical entry in the contemporary fantasy-reference tradition

Buy this book

Books N Bytes participates in affiliate programs including Amazon Associates and Bookshop.org. We may earn a commission when you purchase through our links at no extra cost to you.

The Encyclopedia of Fantasy is the John Clute and John Grant 1997 reference work that did for fantasy what the earlier Encyclopedia of Science Fiction had done for SF: established a working scholarly vocabulary, mapped the genre's major traditions, and indexed the writers and texts that the academy and the fan community had previously failed to catalog with seriousness.

The taxonomic terms Clute and Grant introduced (thinning, water margins, polders, equipoise) have become standard analytical vocabulary in fantasy criticism. The individual writer entries are extensive and unusually opinionated for a reference work; Clute in particular is willing to make explicit judgments about a writer's significance that most encyclopedias prefer to leave implicit.

The book is now nearly thirty years old and predates several major developments in the form (the urban-fantasy boom, the GrimDark turn, the post-Game of Thrones expansion). The foundational mapping has aged remarkably well.

Five stars. The right starting point for anyone studying fantasy as a literary tradition. Recommended without reservation as a reference and as a sustained piece of genre criticism in its own right.

More by this author

Read more from John Clute